The linked-convergent distinction

Hitchcock, David

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15858

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Hitchcock, David	-
dc.date.accessioned	2014-08-29T17:18:20Z	-
dc.date.available	2014-08-29T17:18:20Z	-
dc.date.issued	2015	-
dc.identifier.citation	Hitchcock, David. 2015. The linked-convergent distinction. In Bart Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell, & Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (Eds.), "Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation, July 1-4, 2014." Amsterdam: Sic Sat.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15858	-
dc.description	The content of this paper was presented at the 8th International Conference on Argumentation in Amsterdam on July 4, 2014.	en_US
dc.description.abstract	The linked-convergent distinction introduced by Stephen Thomas in 1977 is primarily a distinction between ways in which two or more reasons can directly support a claim, and only derivatively a distinction between types of structures, arguments, reasoning, reasons, or premisses. As with the deductive-inductive distinction, there may be no fact of the matter as to whether a given multi-premiss argument is linked or convergent.	en_US
dc.language.iso	en_US	en_US
dc.publisher	Sic Sat (International Society for the Study of Argumentation)	en_US
dc.subject	argument structure	en_US
dc.subject	coordinatively compound argumentation	en_US
dc.subject	convergent	en_US
dc.subject	linked	en_US
dc.subject	Monroe C. Beardsley	en_US
dc.subject	multiple argumentation	en_US
dc.subject	Stephen N. Thomas	en_US
dc.subject	support	en_US
dc.title	The linked-convergent distinction	en_US
dc.type	Book chapter	en_US
Appears in Collections:	Philosophy Publications

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
The linked-convergent distinction.pdf Open Access	entire chapter	319.67 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

Show simple item record