Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15416
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorAllen, Barry-
dc.contributor.advisorEnns, Diane-
dc.contributor.authorPosteraro, Tano S.-
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-08T19:55:40Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-08T19:55:40Z-
dc.date.issued2014-11-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/15416-
dc.description.abstractThe motivating ambition of this thesis is the endeavour to think the subject anthropo-eccentrically, to free it of its conscious-agential overtones and to foreground instead the active organism in all its ecologically entangled, metabolically perspectival glory. I define the subject, in the course of the thesis, as a body productive of its own spatial and temporal fields, a body that lives its own space and time. Ecology is pluralized, made bodily. And the body itself is dynamicized and rendered porous—less an absolute limit than a variable topology separating, uniting, and enfolding organism and ecology, self and other, subject and world. I begin, in Chapter 1, with Deleuze and the rhythmic contractions that define the temporal pole of organismic subjectivity. In Chapter 2, I turn toward the way spaces are configured on the basis of the affective enaction of organismic life. This is organismic spatiality. In Chapter 3, I introduce Deleuze’s distinction between the actual and virtual in order to properly theorize the way organismic abilities and environmental layouts are pre-subjectively related such that actual organismic activity individuates a field of spatiotemporal experience. And as the structure of this relation fluctuates, so too does the framework of subjective experience, the sensorimotor-perceptual affects by which experience is defined. Organismic subjectivity is, as a consequence, both relentlessly dynamic and tied irreducibly to the organization of its own world. To think this entanglement is to think subjectivity as swarm, a concept that opens this theory onto an array of new possibilities—toward, to take only one example among a range of many, a human-technological entanglement that conceives scientific apparatuses in their integration with a collectively human subjectivity. I conclude the thesis with a brief gesture toward the implications carried by the development of such possibilities.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophy of Ecologyen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophy of Organismen_US
dc.subjectSubjectivityen_US
dc.subjectTemporalityen_US
dc.subjectSpatialityen_US
dc.subjectGilles Deleuzeen_US
dc.subjectBaruch Spinozaen_US
dc.subjectGilbert Simondonen_US
dc.subjectHenri Bergsonen_US
dc.subjectJames Gibsonen_US
dc.subjectDialectical Biologyen_US
dc.subjectNiche Construction Theoryen_US
dc.titleToward an Organismic Subjectivity: Affect, Relation, Entanglementen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPhilosophyen_US
dc.description.degreetypeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Philosophy (MA)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
T. Posteraro Thesis (Final).pdf
Open Access
Main Thesis3.19 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue