Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15363
Title: The Development of Sensitivity to First-and Second-order Local Motion
Authors: Armstrong, Vickie
Advisor: Lewis, T.L.
Maurer, D.
Department: Psychology
Keywords: Psychology;Neuroscience
Publication Date: May-2009
Abstract: The purpose of this thesis is to determine the timeline of the development of sensitivity to first-order (luminance-defined) versus second-order (contrast-defined) motion and to compare how sensitivity to motion varies with temporal frequency (flicker rate), spatial frequency (stripe size), and velocity. In Chapter 2, I demonstrate that infants' sensitivity to drifting gratings is more adult-like for second-order than first-order stimuli. Moreover, the evidence suggests that infants choose a moving over a stationary grating based on their sensitivity to grating flicker rather than its direction. In Chapter 3, I demonstrate that sensitivity to second-order motion is more adult-like than sensitivity to first-order motion at all ages tested. Children reach adult-like levels of sensitivity to motion at 7 years when stimuli are second-order, but are still worse than adults at 10 years when stimuli are first-order. Furthermore, sensitivity to motion varies with temporal frequency when stimuli are first-order, but spatial frequency when stimuli are second-order. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that first-order motion is processed using low-level motion mechanisms, while second-order motion is processed using a feature tracking mechanism. In Chapter 4, I explored sensitivity to second-order motion in 5-year-olds and adults using directional and non-directional motion tasks. Children's sensitivity to motion is more immature when temporal frequency is relatively low, but only for the directional motion tasks. All participants perform better on the non-directional than the directional task, but only when temporal frequency is relatively high. These results are consistent with Seiffert and Cavanagh's (1998) findings that second-order motion is processed by a feature tracking mechanism. Combined, these findings are consistent with the idea that first-and second-order motion are processed, at least in part, by different neural mechanisms.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15363
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Armstrong Vickie.pdf
Open Access
6.72 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue