Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15332
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSingh, Ramaen_US
dc.contributor.advisorDr. Richard Morton, Dr. Bhagwati Gupta and Dr. Ana Camposen_US
dc.contributor.authorCheng, Shengen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T21:13:41Z-
dc.date.created2014-01-14en_US
dc.date.issued2014-04en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8738en_US
dc.identifier.other9813en_US
dc.identifier.other4986021en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/15332-
dc.description.abstract<p>Evolutionary innovations, at the molecular level, represent the novel establishment of regulation networks among previously unconnected genes. Understanding the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlies the development of such innovations is of central importance in evolutionary-developmental research (evo-devo). The sex comb of <em>Drosophila</em> is an excellent model to study the molecular basis of evolutionary innovations. Highline and Lowline are two artificial selected <em>D. melanogaster</em> lines differing in the number of sex comb bristles. It was expected that the “cross-regulation loop” between two transcription factors, <em>Doublesex</em> male isoform (DSX<sup>M</sup>) and <em>Sexcombs reduced</em> (SCR), evolves rapidly and promotes the morphological evolution of sex combs. We used immunofluorescent technique (antibody staining) to compare the expression of DSX<sup>M</sup> and SCR in the forelegs of three different lines (Highline, Wildtype and Lowline). We hypothesized that artificial selection will increase expression of DSX<sup>M </sup>and SCR in the Highline and reduce expression in the Lowline. The fluorescent pictures of antibody staining experiments indicate that the expression region of DSX<sup>M</sup> in the Highline is significantly higher than the expression region in the Lowline, and the expression levels of SCR has minor difference among the three lines. DSX<sup>M</sup> expression is altered by the artificial selection, but SCR expression is not. The influence of artificial selection appears to have been constrained by development. Our investigation provides an approach to test the validity of the models of cross-regulation s between SCR and DSX<sup>M</sup> during development.</p>en_US
dc.subjectMelanogasteren_US
dc.subjectSex Combsen_US
dc.subjectartificially selected linesen_US
dc.subjectdoublesexen_US
dc.subjectSexcomb reduceden_US
dc.subjectDevelopmental Biologyen_US
dc.subjectDevelopmental Biologyen_US
dc.titleMolecular developmental analysis of artificial selection response in the male sex combs of Drosophila melanogasteren_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBiologyen_US
dc.date.embargo2015-01-14-
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.date.embargoset2015-01-14en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2015-01-13
34.78 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue