Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15302
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorCarey, Seanen_US
dc.contributor.authorShatilla, Nadine J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T21:13:33Z-
dc.date.created2013-10-01en_US
dc.date.issued2013-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8394en_US
dc.identifier.other9476en_US
dc.identifier.other4654484en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/15302-
dc.description.abstract<p>Surface mining is a common method of accessing coal. In high-elevation environments, vegetation and soils are typically removed prior to the blasting of overburden rock thereby allowing access to mineable ore. The removed waste rock is deposited in adjacent valleys where it may bury existing streams. Previous research, predominantly in Appalachia, has focused on downstream water quality impacts with less focus on how streamflow response and flow pathways are affected by surface mining. This study reports on how surface mining affects streamflow hydrological and chemical responses at the headwater catchment scale in the Elk Valley, British Columbia. A paired catchment approach was utilized between May and October 2012, where a reference catch- ment (Dry Creek - DC) was compared to an impacted catchment (West Line Creek - WLC), whose area is 30% covered by deposited waste rock. Hydrometrically, WLC had considerably lower flows and exhibited a damped, slower response to precipitation events than DC. Dissolved ions were an order of magnitude greater in WLC, with conductivity (SpC) ranging between 400 μS/cm at high flow to 1300 μS/cm at low flow. A strong hysteretic pattern was observed between SpC and flow and with specific ions at WLC, suggesting dilution or changing flowpaths as the season progressed. In contrast, patterns of SpC and flow at DC did not exhibit hysteresis. Major ion hydrochemistry at WLC shows dilution affecting ion concentrations whereas results at DC are consistent with chemostatic behavior. Stable isotopes were more depleted at DC compared with WLC, suggesting different sources and timing of water contributing to streamflow. Future research will work towards a conceptual model of surface mining impacts on catchment scale processes in montane environments through increased understanding of residence time and flowpath distributions at a number of impacted and reference catchments.</p>en_US
dc.subjectcathcment hydrologyen_US
dc.subjectalpineen_US
dc.subjectcoalen_US
dc.subjectwater qualityen_US
dc.subjectminingen_US
dc.subjectBritish Columbiaen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Indicators and Impact Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectHydrologyen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Indicators and Impact Assessmenten_US
dc.titleTHE INFLUENCE OF SURFACE MINING ON RUNOFF TIMING AND FLOW PATHWAYS IN ELK VALLEY, BRITISH COLUMBIAen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentGeography and Earth Sciencesen_US
dc.date.embargo2014-09-01-
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
dc.date.embargoset2014-09-01en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2014-08-31
18.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue