Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15298
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorWatter, Scotten_US
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Sandra J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T21:13:32Z-
dc.date.created2013-09-23en_US
dc.date.issued2013-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8350en_US
dc.identifier.other9368en_US
dc.identifier.other4616774en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/15298-
dc.description.abstract<p>The psychological refractory period (PRP) paradigm has been used extensively to investigate the cognitive processing stages involved in dual-task performance. Interpretations of PRP data have often attributed the difficulty in simultaneously performing two cognitive tasks to a strict serial processing bottleneck in the response selection stage. However, a number of studies have also demonstrated backward response compatibility effects (BCEs) on Task 1 reaction time in dual-task performance, which suggest that response information for Task 2 may be activated in parallel with Task 1 response selection. The goal of this thesis was to examine the nature of the Task 2 processing that operates in parallel with Task 1 response selection in a PRP task, and to consider the implications of this parallel processing for models of dual-task performance. The results of the empirical studies presented here provide converging evidence that the BCE represents automatically activated response information for Task 2 acting on Task 1 response selection. This Task 2 response information can also contribute to Task 2 performance. Models of dual-task performance must account for both the parallel activation of response information and the serial selection of a response for each task.</p>en_US
dc.subjectpsychological refractory perioden_US
dc.subjectdivided attentionen_US
dc.subjectdual-tasken_US
dc.subjectresponse selectionen_US
dc.subjectbottlenecken_US
dc.subjectbackward crosstalken_US
dc.subjectCognitive Psychologyen_US
dc.subjectCognitive Psychologyen_US
dc.titleBackward Compatibility Effects in Dual-Task Performance: Implications for Central Information Processingen_US
dc.typedissertationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.date.embargo2014-09-01-
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
dc.date.embargoset2014-09-01en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2014-08-31
1.23 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue