Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15247
Title: Biochemical analysis of telomeric repeat binding factor 1
Authors: Jeyanthan, Kajaparan
Advisor: Zhu, Xu-Dong
Junop, Murray
Department: Biology
Keywords: Telomere;TRF1;phosphorylation;Pin2;Biochemistry;Molecular Biology;Biochemistry
Publication Date: Oct-2012
Abstract: <p>TRF1 is an essential shelterin protein that binds to double stranded telomeric DNA. TRF1 is best known for its role as a negative regulator of telomere length. Post-translational modifications, like phosphorylation, have been shown to regulate TRF1 function in cells. Mass spectrometric analysis revealed three potential TRF1 phosphorylation sites, threonine 271, serine 279 and threonine 305 <em>in vivo</em>. To analyze the function of these three potential phosphorylation sites, phosphomimic (aspartic acid, D) and non-phosphorylatable (alanine, A) mutations were made to be analyzed <em>in vitro</em>. Through <em>in vitro</em> gel shift assays, the phosphomimic mutation at threonine 271 mutant exhibits a DNA binding defect, whereas serine 279 and threonine 305 mutants have no binding defects. However, <em>in vivo</em> analysis needs to be conducted in order to determine whether this binding defect is authentic.</p> <p>PIN2 is a TRF1 isoform, which is identical in its protein sequence with the exception of 20 amino acids (residue 296-316 of TRF1). The second study looks to characterize any potential functional differences between PIN2 and TRF1. <em>In vitro</em>, CDK1 kinase assay was conducted on TRF1 and PIN2 mutants to assess whether there was a difference in phosphorylation. The kinase assay revealed that both PIN2 threonine 351 and TRF1 threonine 371 are both phosphorylated by CDK1. However, the net phosphorylation level of PIN2 by CDK1 is far lower than the net phosphorylation level of TRF1. An <em>in vitro</em> gel shift assay was also conducted to analyze the binding difference between TRF1 threonine 371 and PIN2 threonine 351 mutants. The DNA binding assay revealed that TRF1 threonine 371D mutant has a binding defect, whereas PIN2 threonine 351D mutant has no binding defect. However, this data needs to be verified to determine whether a PIN2 threonine 351D mutant behaves like a phosphomimic.</p>
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15247
Identifier: opendissertations/7512
8570
3351973
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Access is allowed from: 2014-09-25
3.06 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue