Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15102
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Veall, Mike | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-18T20:30:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-18T20:30:49Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2009-01-22 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2008-08-05 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | team/1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 1001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 699131 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/15102 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>The Principles:</p> <p>1. All units of the university should be reviewed regularly</p> <p>2. Different units of the university should be reviewed differently</p> <p>3. Units should have significant input into the criteria by which they are reviewed</p> <p>4. Reviews should be as transparent as possible at all stages and should afford the opportunity for input to all relevant members of the community</p> <p>5. At least some of the review team should be external to the unit</p> <p>6. Reviews should include comparisons</p> <p>7. Reviews should focus on the “output” of the unit in question in relation to its resource use</p> <p>8. Reviews should not be unduly onerous</p> <p>9.Reviews must be followed-up</p> | en_US |
dc.subject | Education | en_US |
dc.subject | Education | en_US |
dc.title | Report of the Chair | en_US |
dc.type | report | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Task Force on Evaluation, Accountability and Measurement |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
fulltext.pdf | 24.46 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.