Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/14225
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorArapura, J. G.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNelson, Lance E.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:06:44Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:06:44Z-
dc.date.created2014-05-29en_US
dc.date.issued1986-06en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/9048en_US
dc.identifier.other10130en_US
dc.identifier.other5630534en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/14225-
dc.description.abstract<p>Madhusudana Sarasvati (16th century), one of the greatest and most vigorous exponents of post-Samkara Advaita, was simultaneously, and somewhat paradoxically, a great devotee of Krsna. He authored several works in which he sought to give bhakti a more prominent place within Advaita, a system traditionally regarded as hostile to devotional spirituality. The Bhaktirasayana (BR), the most important of these, is an independent composition which attempts a theoretical integration of non-dualist metaphysics and the ecstatic devotionalism of the Bhagavata Purana. The work's main thesis, borrowed from the Vaisnava devotionalists, is that bhakti is highest goal of life (paramapurusartha). To establish this in the face of the orthodox Advaita doctrine that liberation alone is the highest aim, Madhusudana argues (1) that bhakti is God (bhagavat) appearing in the melted mind of the devotee, (2) that, since bhagavat is supreme bliss, so is bhakti, and (3) that bhakti includes knowledge of the atman and is a more blissful experience than moksa. While the argument for the experiential superiority of bhakti in the state of j ivanmukti ("liberation in life") is plausible, Madhusudana does not show, in Advaitic terms, how it can be experienced eternally after death. Moreover, he fails to establish that bhagavat is ontologically equal to Brahman, which makes it difficult to see how bhakti, as identified with bhagavat, can be ontologically superior, or even equal, to moksa. In short, he does not present a convincing argument for bhakti 's being the paramapurusartha. In later works such as the Gud a rthad ipika and Advaitassiddhi, Madhusudana abandons the idea that bhakti is an independent spiritual path and itself the paramapurus a rtha. The commonly accepted view that he was a champion of the cause of bhakti who successfully integrated devotion and Advaita cannot therefore be accepted without serious qualification.</p>en_US
dc.subjectBhaktien_US
dc.subjectMadhusudanaen_US
dc.subjectSarasvati'sen_US
dc.subjectArts and Humanitiesen_US
dc.subjectEnglish Language and Literatureen_US
dc.titleBhakti in Advaita Vedanta: A Translation and Study of Madhusadana Sarasvatt's Bhaktirasayanaen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentReligious Studiesen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
22.4 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue