Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/14197
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLevitt, Cyrilen_US
dc.contributor.authorLevine, Boris Mishaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:06:37Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:06:37Z-
dc.date.created2014-05-13en_US
dc.date.issued1999-06en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/9020en_US
dc.identifier.other10067en_US
dc.identifier.other5572948en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/14197-
dc.description.abstract<p>The dissertation is a study of the 1985 alcohol policy reform in the Soviet Union. The task is to explain the making and failure of the policy, and to examine the policy as a case in rule creation in society. More specifically, I analyze the policy-making in terms of symbolic politics, moral entrepreneurship, and the prohibitive measures it led to a5 a reaction to alcohol abuse. Each of these concepts offers a partial explanation of rule creation. Yet, none adequately explains the policy repeal, much less the creation of informal social definitions of right and wrong. Similar to alcohol prohibitions in the USA, Finland and Canada, the Soviet alcohol reform effort attempted but ultimately did not succeed in changing the social definition of alcohol and drinking. This is in contrast to cannabis, opium and cocaine prohibitions that aimed to preserve existing definitions and have been largely successful around the world. The relationship between formal and informal definitions is addressed as a key element in any understanding of variations in the fate ofmoral reforms. From this standpoint, the post-reform period comes to be viewed as a distinct stage wherein the viability of a proposed definition is tested. Presently dominant approaches to the definitional process appear to limit their own potential in that they refuse to reconsider assumptions that can be shown erroneous, do not differentiate between dissimilar processes and settings, do not ask more pointed research questions and do not stimulate empirically grounded and verifiable explanations. To redress these limitations, I offer a critical reexamination of both the moral entrepreneur and claims-making approaches to social definition-making.</p>en_US
dc.subjectAlcoholen_US
dc.subjectUSSRen_US
dc.subjectMorals rejecteden_US
dc.subjectRegional Sociologyen_US
dc.subjectSocial Control, Law, Crime, and Devianceen_US
dc.subjectSociologyen_US
dc.subjectRegional Sociologyen_US
dc.titleThe 1985 Alcohol Reform in the USSR: A Case of Rejected Moral Reformen_US
dc.typedissertationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSociologyen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
15.78 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue