Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/14049
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorThabane, Lehanaen_US
dc.contributor.advisorPapaioannou, Alexandraen_US
dc.contributor.advisorAdachi, Jonathan D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Courtney C.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:06:09Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:06:09Z-
dc.date.created2014-04-02en_US
dc.date.issued2014-04en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8879en_US
dc.identifier.other9957en_US
dc.identifier.other5429161en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/14049-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background:</strong> Despite strong evidence, strategies for improving bone health are underutilized. Knowledge translation (KT) interventions aim to improve uptake of evidence-based practices, however the feasibility and effectiveness of such strategies require further evaluation within Long-term Care (LTC). In this thesis, we examined the impacts of a province-wide osteoporosis strategy and a more intensive multifaceted KT strategy including expert-led educational meetings, audit/feed-back, and action planning for quality improvement. Both studies targeted interdisciplinary LTC teams (physicians, nurses, pharmacists, dietician, and other staff).</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>In the first thesis study, we examined the impact of the <em>Ontario Osteoporosis Strategy for LTC</em> by investigating changes in facility-level prescribing rates (vitamin D, calcium, osteoporosis medications) before and after its implementation (2007 versus 2012). The second study was a pilot cluster randomized trial evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a 12-month, multifaceted, interdisciplinary KT intervention [Vitamin D and Osteoporosis Study (ViDOS)]. Prescribing outcomes included: vitamin D ≥800 IU (primary), calcium ≥500 mg/day, and osteoporosis medications (high-risk residents only). Feasibility outcomes included recruitment, retention, data collection, intervention fidelity, and process changes. We analyzed resident level data using the generalized estimating equations (GEE) technique, adjusting for clustering.</p> <p><strong>Results:</strong></p> <p>In both studies, significant improvements were observed for vitamin D and calcium prescribing. In the first study, prescribing increased by 38% and 4%, respectively, between 2007 and 2012. In the ViDOS trial, the 12-month intervention resulted in an absolute improvement of 15% and 7%, respectively (intention to treat cohort). There was no significant effect for prescribing of osteoporosis medications in either study. In the ViDOS study, recruitment and retention rates were 22% and 63%, respectively; good intervention fidelity was achieved and intervention homes reported several process changes.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion:</strong></p> <p>This thesis study demonstrated that KT interventions targeting evidence-based osteoporosis and fracture prevention strategies were feasibly and effectively applied with interdisciplinary LTC teams.</p>en_US
dc.subjectKnowledge Translationen_US
dc.subjectOsteoporosisen_US
dc.subjectFracturesen_US
dc.subjectPrescribingen_US
dc.subjectLong-term Care homesen_US
dc.subjectVitamin Den_US
dc.subjectKnowledge Translationen_US
dc.subjectKnowledge Translationen_US
dc.titleEVALUATING THE FEASIBILITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF EVIDENCE-BASED KNOWLEDGE TRANSLATION INTERVENTIONS TARGETING OSTEOPOROSIS AND FRACTURE PREVENTION IN ONTARIO LONG-TERM CARE HOMESen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentClinical Health Sciences (Health Research Methodology)en_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
8.42 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue