Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13961
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDavies, Scotten_US
dc.contributor.advisorNeil McLaughlin, John Cairney, Cheryl Missiunaen_US
dc.contributor.authorDeRoche, Christinaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:05:42Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:05:42Z-
dc.date.created2014-01-24en_US
dc.date.issued2014-04en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8793en_US
dc.identifier.other9847en_US
dc.identifier.other5015902en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13961-
dc.description.abstract<p>Labelling Theory stipulates that once an individual exhibits deviant behaviour, such as acting outside of the norm, the public and even close relatives will react to this behaviour by labelling it. Some of these labels result in social and psychological consequences for the individual, and Labelling theorists argue that, at the very extreme, they culminate in a self-fulfilling prophecy wherein the labelled individual fulfills the expectations others have placed upon him/her. Labelling Theory has been questioned for its lack of consistent supporting empirical evidence and still faces much scrutiny by leaving many unanswered questions, particularly within educational contexts. Several societal changes have created a profoundly different climate for labelling in the domains of mental health and education and beg the re-evaluation of labelling theory’s original arguments.</p> <p>This dissertation empirically tests the main tenets of Labelling Theory within an educational setting by exploring the experiences of children identified as having symptoms of Developmental Coordination Disorder in aNorthern Ontariocity. This study finds that children who are yet undiagnosed with DCD are often stigmatized not only by their peers, but also by educators, public, and even close relatives. However, those children who were formally labelled were granted more opportunities and were often more accommodated within the educational context. It also finds that formally labelled children often had varying degrees of self-confidence; conversely, those who were not labelled or awaiting diagnosis were often more critical of their abilities and were frequently socially isolated. Finally, this study found that parents played an active role in acquiring formal labels and services for their children throughout the diagnostic process and afterwards. These findings have implications for educational and health care related policies and future research for Labelling Theory.</p>en_US
dc.subjectLabelling Theoryen_US
dc.subjectStigmaen_US
dc.subjectSick Roleen_US
dc.subjectTherapeutic Cultureen_US
dc.subjectDevelopmental Coordination Disorderen_US
dc.subjectEducational Labelsen_US
dc.subjectEducational Sociologyen_US
dc.subjectMedicine and Healthen_US
dc.subjectEducational Sociologyen_US
dc.titleLabels, Stigma and Sick Roles in a Therapeutic Culture: The Case of Developmental Coordination Disorderen_US
dc.typedissertationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSociologyen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
2.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue