Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13948
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorVitkin, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLo, Alexander A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:05:41Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:05:41Z-
dc.date.created2014-02-05en_US
dc.date.issued1994en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8781en_US
dc.identifier.other9863en_US
dc.identifier.other5070512en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13948-
dc.description.abstract<p>In the Philosophy of History. Hegel argues that the empire of ancient China constitutes the beginning of history. While lithe end of history as a fundamental problem has been commented on extensively in 20th century Hegel scholarship, lithe beginning" has been relatively neglected. This thesis is an attempt to fill an existing gap. It examines Hegel's interpretation of Chinese history in the context of his political and historical philosophy as a whole. It argues that his interpretation proceeds from the vantage point of western modernity. While modern ethical life. according to Hegel. is characterized by the dialectical relationships between the family. civil society. and the state. Chinese ethical life does not differentiate beyond the ethical substance of the family. The Chinese state is model led on the structure of the family and ethical-political duties are defined in terms of filial obligations: moral subjectivity and autonomy which precede modern ethical life are lacking in Chinese culture. Because of the non-differentiation of the Chinese ethical substance. Chinese history is essentially static or non-dialectical. on Hegel's view. In the last two chapters. this thesis attempts to determine the insights as welI I as the limitations of Hegel's account of China in the context of the fundamental changes which modern China has undergone and is still undergoing.</p>en_US
dc.subjectHegelen_US
dc.subjectancient Chinaen_US
dc.subjectbeginning of historyen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.titleHegel's Interpretation of Chinese Historyen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPhilosophyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
3.69 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue