Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13816
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Vorobej, M. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sullivan, Andrew | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-18T17:05:21Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-18T17:05:21Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2013-12-02 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 1996-09 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | opendissertations/8646 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 9661 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 4865465 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13816 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>It seems everyone who encounters David Lewis's modal real ism finds it utterly strange. I attempt to show that it is strange because it expands our onto logy unnecessarily.</p> <p>I begin by situating Lewis in the tradition of understanding modality with the help of possible worlds. I go on to indicate the internal tensions which arise under Lewis's view when we consider sane kinds of perfectly normal modal discourse. T try to show that the problem comes from an understanding of existence which is quite common in analytic philosophy. I then suggest a way of understanding modal language which finds its inspiration in the writings of st Thomas Aquinas, Ludwig Wittgenstein, and Donald Davidson.</p> | en_US |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.title | The modal realism of David Lewis | en_US |
dc.type | thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Arts (MA) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
fulltext.pdf | 4.32 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.