Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13779
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBecker, Sueen_US
dc.contributor.advisorBennett, Patrick J.en_US
dc.contributor.authorToulouse, Trent M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:05:13Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:05:13Z-
dc.date.created2013-12-04en_US
dc.date.issued2014-04en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8607en_US
dc.identifier.other9667en_US
dc.identifier.other4880668en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13779-
dc.description.abstract<p>Evidence suggests that a change in the firing rate of dopamine (DA) cells is a major neurobiological correlate of learning. The Temporal Difference (TD) learning algorithm provides a popular account of the DA signal as conveying the error between expected and actual rewards. Other accounts have attempted to code the DA firing pattern as conveying surprise or salience. The DA mediated cells have also been implicated in several neuropsychological disorders such as obsessive compulsive disorder and schizophrenia. Compelling neuropsychological explanations of the DA signal also frame it as conveying salience. A model-based reinforcement learning algorithm using a salience signal analogous to dopamine neurons was built and used to model existing animal behavioral data.</p> <p>Different reinforcement learning models were then compared under conditions of altered DA firing patterns. Several differing predictions of the TD model and the salience model were compared against animal behavioral data in an obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) model using a dopamine agonist. The results show that the salience model predictions more accurately model actual animal behavior.</p> <p>The role of context in the salience model is different than the standard TD-learning algorithm. Several predictions of the salience model for how people should respond to context shifts of differing salience were tested against known behavioral correlates of endogenous dopamine levels. As predicted, individuals with behavioral traits correlated with higher endogenous dopamine levels are far more sensitive to low salience context shifts than those with correlates to lower endogenous dopamine levels. This is a unique prediction of the salience model for the DA signal which allows for better integration of reinforcement learning models and neuropsychological frameworks for discussing the role of dopamine in learning, memory and behavior.</p>en_US
dc.subjectDopamineen_US
dc.subjectReward Learningen_US
dc.subjectContexten_US
dc.subjectTemporal-Differenceen_US
dc.subjectModel-baseden_US
dc.subjectReinforcementen_US
dc.subjectCognitive Psychologyen_US
dc.subjectExperimental Analysis of Behavioren_US
dc.subjectCognitive Psychologyen_US
dc.titleCONTEXT AND SALIENCE: THE ROLE OF DOPAMINE IN REWARD LEARNING AND NEUROPSYCHIATRIC DISORDERSen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Science (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
1.63 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue