Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13636
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorVishniac, Ethanen_US
dc.contributor.advisorPudritz, Ralphen_US
dc.contributor.advisorWadsley, Jamesen_US
dc.contributor.authorCridland, Alex J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:04:42Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:04:42Z-
dc.date.created2013-10-30en_US
dc.date.issued2014-04en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8473en_US
dc.identifier.other9543en_US
dc.identifier.other4777315en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13636-
dc.description.abstract<p>Here we present direct numerical simulations of a shearing box which models the MHD turbulence in astrophysical systems with cylindrical geometries. The purpose of these simulations is to detect the source of the electromotive force - the driver of large scale magnetic field evolution. This electromotive force is responsible for the large scale dynamo action which builds and maintains the magnetic field against dissipation in plasmas. We compare the estimates of the electromotive force from the kinematic approximation of mean field theory - the most prevalent theory for astrophysical dynamos - with a modified version of mean field theory which restricts the electromotive force by the consideration of magnetic helicity conservation. We will show that in general the kinematic approximation overestimates the observed electromotive force for the majority of the simulation, while the term derived from the helicity conservation estimates the electromotive force very well. We will also illustrate the importance of the shear in the fluid to the growth and strength of the resulting large scale magnetic field. Too strong and the small scale dynamo does not grow enough to properly seed a strong large scale dynamo. Too weak, and no large scale magnetic field is observed after the small scale dynamo has saturated. Finally, we will find that in order to maintain the strength of the emerged large scale magnetic dynamo we require a magnetic Prandtl number ($Pr \equiv \nu/\eta$) that is at least an order of magnitude above unity.</p>en_US
dc.subjectAstrophysicsen_US
dc.subjectMagnetohydrodynamicsen_US
dc.subjectMHDen_US
dc.subjectdynamo theoryen_US
dc.subjectdirect numerical simulationen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Processesen_US
dc.subjectPhysical Processesen_US
dc.titleDirect Numerical Simulations of Magnetic Helicity Conserving Astrophysical Dynamosen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPhysics and Astronomyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
4.03 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue