Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13590
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBecker, Sueen_US
dc.contributor.advisorTrainor, Laurelen_US
dc.contributor.advisorRoberts, Larryen_US
dc.contributor.authorBruce, Jeffen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:04:31Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:04:31Z-
dc.date.created2013-08-13en_US
dc.date.issued2013-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8425en_US
dc.identifier.other9086en_US
dc.identifier.other4431504en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13590-
dc.description.abstract<p>This Master’s thesis presents results from two clinical hearing aid studies. Wide dynamic range compression (WDRC), a hearing aid amplification algorithm widely used in the hearing aid industry, is compared against a novel hearing aid called the Neuro-Compensator (NC), which employs a neural-based amplification algorithm based on a computational model of the auditory periphery. The NC strategy involves preprocessing an incoming auditory signal, such that when the signal is presented to a damaged cochlea, auditory nerve output is reconstructed to look similar to the auditory nerve output of a healthy cochlea for the original auditory signal. The NC and WDRC hearing aid technologies are compared across a multitude of auditory domains. Objective measures of speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise, music perception, sound localization, and subjective measures of sound quality are obtained. It was hypothesized that the NC would restore more normal auditory abilities across auditory domains, due to its proposed strategy of restoring more normal auditory nerve output. Results from the clinical hearing aid studies quantified domains in which the NC was superior to WDRC, and vice versa.</p>en_US
dc.subjecthearing aidsen_US
dc.subjectpsychoacousticsen_US
dc.subjectspeech intelligibilityen_US
dc.subjectmusic perceptionen_US
dc.subjectsound localizationen_US
dc.subjectCommunication Sciences and Disordersen_US
dc.subjectCommunication Sciences and Disordersen_US
dc.titleA Comprehensive Comparative Hearing Aid Study: Evaluating the Neuro-Compensator Relative to Wide Dynamic Range Compressionen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
3.35 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue