Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13582
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPotvin, Jim R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorCappelletto, Jessica A.M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:04:28Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:04:28Z-
dc.date.created2013-10-07en_US
dc.date.issued2013-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8417en_US
dc.identifier.other9493en_US
dc.identifier.other4677954en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13582-
dc.description.abstract<p>In many occupational tasks, environmental constraints limit how close a worker can place their body to a desired element of the task. Although this provides an obstacle when performing the task, workplace obstructions can often be used by a worker to externally support their body by means of bracing. The purpose of this thesis was to identify how a worker’s posture would differ when the task must be performed with a constrained reach, compared to having the option to externally support against the thighs. At 4 different task hand Locations, subjects performed 6 exertions, comprised of 2 Loads (27.5 N and 55 N) and 3 Directions (Up, Down, and Pull). Subjects were able to choose if bracing would be used when performing the first 24 trial exertions. After the choice conditions had been collected, trials were performed again with a forced brace or unbraced. The most important finding of this study was that participants were twice as likely to brace when performing a task with a far reach. In addition, average brace forces were approximately 117 N for Up and Pull exertions, and were nearly half that (67 N) for Down exertions. Participants would brace at a lower height at low versus high locations. Flexing the trunk forward and twisting the right shoulder forward, combined with a more flexed task arm and reduced shoulder rotation, allowed participants to adopt a posture where their shoulder was closer to the point of exertion during braced exertions, thereby increasing their functional arm length.</p>en_US
dc.subjectbiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectergonomicsen_US
dc.subjectexternal supporten_US
dc.subjectbracingen_US
dc.subjectconstrained reachingen_US
dc.subjectextended reachen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.subjectKinesiologyen_US
dc.subjectLife Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectBiomechanicsen_US
dc.titleTHE USE OF LOWER BODY BRACING DURING ONE-HANDED SUBMAXIMAL EXERTIONS WITH EXTENDED REACHESen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKinesiologyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science in Kinesiologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
8.9 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue