Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13565
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | R. A. Muller, Stuart Mestelman and David Bjerk | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Buckley, Neil J. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-18T17:04:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-18T17:04:24Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2013-10-02 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2004-11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | opendissertations/8400 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 9483 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 4658235 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13565 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Two approaches to emissions trading are cap-and-trade, in which an aggregate cap on emissions is distributed in the form of allowance permits, and baseline-and-credit, in which firms earn emission reduction credits for emissions below their baselines. Theory suggests the long-run equilibrium of the cap-and-trade plan is socially optimal, whereas the corresponding baselineand- credit equilibrium is inefficient, since the baseline creates a subsidy to output. In the short-run, however, when output capacity is fixed, the two plans are predicted to be identical. Surprisingly, despite the long-run predictions, both approaches are used around the world.</p> <p>To test whether these predictions hold in real markets, we developed a computerized laboratory environment in which subjects, representing firms, can adjust their emission technology and capacity levels. Subjects trade emission rights in a uniform price sealed bid-ask auction. The demand for output is simulated. All decisions are tracked through a double-entry bookkeeping system. Full documentation of the software is attached as an appendix.</p> <p>Primarily, this dissertation presents results from the first ever experimental economic analysis comparing the two most commonly proposed and implemented emission trading policy instruments: cap-and-trade and rated-based baseline-and-credit emission permit trading. After creating a laboratory implementation of the theoretical setting, we report results from simulations with robot traders in a long-run environment. These simulations verify the long-run predictions. Simulations and pilot experiments provide interesting evidence on permit market volatilities and effects of various accounting rules. As a first step towards testing the long-run model with human subjects, this dissertation reports on a laboratory experiment designed to test the short-run predictions. The short-run experiments support the theoretical prediction that the two mechanisms yield similar outcomes, however both exhibit significant deviation from the predicted equilibrium.</p> | en_US |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.title | Implications of Alternative Emission Trading Plans | en_US |
dc.type | thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Economics | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
fulltext.pdf | 2.35 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.