Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13559
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGentilcore, R. L.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDilley, Robert S.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:04:23Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:04:23Z-
dc.date.created2013-10-02en_US
dc.date.issued1991-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8396en_US
dc.identifier.other9480en_US
dc.identifier.other4657940en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13559-
dc.description.abstract<p>Traditionally, the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries in England have been considered a period of unprecedented change in farming techniques and output, of the 'Agricultural Revolution'. current opinion sees agricultural change taking much longer, over several centuries of change and improvement.</p> <p>This thesis examines the contention that in Cumberland, a large county in northwest England, the period 1700 to 1850 did represent one of agricultural revolution. It is shown that isolation, a difficult physical environment, absentee landownership and peculiar tenures combined to retard improvement in both animal husbandry and field management.</p> <p>Although the common arable fields had largely disappeared by 1700, the huge common wastes were vitalĀ· to the local agricultural economy. Encroachment on the wastes is seen as a tolerated method of increasing farm holdings; but the key change was enclosure. Examination of various physical and socioeconomic variables leads to the conclusion that altitude and slope were the dominant factors in distinguishing early from late enclosures: soil, agricultural potential, distance from urban areas and number of landowners involved do not seem to have been important. However, understanding is incomplete without considering the interplay of landlord and tenant: enfranchisement, intercommon and even personality conflicts played a part in the process.</p> <p>Overall, it is concluded that if there was a Cumberland agricultural revolution from 1700 to 1850 it was largely confined to the enclosure of the common wastes: that other forms of agricultural advance had to wait the later nineteenth or even the twentieth century. The thesis provides new or revised data on several matters, such as the number and size of common arable fields, and the rate of enclosure of the common wastes, and puts a wide range of agricultural changes in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries into context.</p>en_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.titleAgricultural Change and Common Land in Cumberland 1700-1850en_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentGeographyen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
22.26 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue