Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13556
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorLee, Billen_US
dc.contributor.advisorCaranza, Mirnaen_US
dc.contributor.advisorGreene, Saaraen_US
dc.contributor.authorCollver, Chase A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:04:23Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:04:23Z-
dc.date.created2013-09-24en_US
dc.date.issued2013-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8392en_US
dc.identifier.other9374en_US
dc.identifier.other4617081en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13556-
dc.description.abstract<p>Recent trends in community development efforts rely on social capital to solve issues at the local level through consensus building, increasing capacity and citizen empowerment. The asset based community development (ABCD) approach assumes relationships and partnerships built on networks of trust and shared norms build communities beneficial for all members. The current community capacity building approach blurs political interests and supports the current neoliberal agenda of the state and private interests to shift the responsibility and management of social problems to the community. This project calls in to question the potential of an assets based community development strategy as it has been attempted in Hamilton, Ontario to lead to long-term structural change in addressing social issues at the root. Findings suggest that despite the number of community projects appearing on the ground, there is little evidence to support asset based community development and social capital that leads to long-term structural change in communities, or economic prosperity to the extent proponents suggest. Furthermore, contrary to the claim of resident leadership, the findings suggest models that attempt to include resident participation are still managed, funded, and administered by professionals in organizations in a ‘top down’ manner. Additional discussion will explore how social capital and capacity can be used toward meeting social justice outcomes in communities.</p>en_US
dc.subjectSocial Capitalen_US
dc.subjectAsset Based Community Developmenten_US
dc.subjectCapacity Buildingen_US
dc.subjectSocial Justiceen_US
dc.subjectLimitationsen_US
dc.subjectCommunity Developmenten_US
dc.subjectLocality Developmenten_US
dc.subjectCommunity Engagementen_US
dc.subjectSocial Worken_US
dc.subjectCommunity Engagementen_US
dc.titleGetting Ahead or Just Enough To Get By? The Limits of Social Capital in an Asset Based Community Development Modelen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSocial Worken_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Social Work (MSW)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
253.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue