Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13415
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMachiela, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.advisorSchuller, Eileenen_US
dc.contributor.advisorWesterholm, Stephenen_US
dc.contributor.authorPerrin, Andrewen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:03:49Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:03:49Z-
dc.date.created2013-09-18en_US
dc.date.issued2013-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/8236en_US
dc.identifier.other9295en_US
dc.identifier.other4598225en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13415-
dc.description.abstract<p>Twenty-nine of the some 900 fragmentary Scrolls recovered from the caves off the northwest shores of the Dead Sea were penned in the Aramaic language. It is generally agreed that this cross-section of Aramaic literature among the predominantly Hebrew collection derives from before and beyond the scribal community that lived at Qumran. Whether or not the Aramaic texts constitute a cohesive collection, however, is an ongoing debate. While their compositional origins are unknown, this dissertation avers that enough common traits exist among the Aramaic Dead Sea Scrolls to indicate an inherent unity in the group. Paramount among these traits is the pervasive usage of the dream-vision in a constellation of at least nineteen Aramaic writings.</p> <p>This study advances our understanding of the Aramaic texts by exploring the dream-vision as a literary convention from two interrelated perspectives. Part One maps out the major compositional patterns of dream-vision episodes across the collection. Special attention is paid to recurring literary-philological features (e.g., motifs, images, phrases, idioms, etc.), which suggest that pairs or clusters of texts are affiliated intertextually, tradition-historically, or originated in scribal circles in close proximity. Part Two articulates three predominant concerns advanced or addressed by dream-vision revelation. It is argued that the authors of these materials utilized the dream-vision (i) for scriptural exegesis of the patriarchal traditions, (ii) to endorse particular understandings of the origins and functions of the priesthood, and (iii) for historiography by creating <em>ex eventu </em>revelations of aspects or all of world history. In tandem these two components affirm the centrality of the dream-vision to the thought world of the Aramaic texts as well as demonstrate that this revelatory <em>topos</em> was deployed using a shared stock of language in order to introduce a closely defined set of concerns.</p>en_US
dc.subjectpseudepigraphy; rewritten and parabiblical literature; priestly theology; historiography; apocalypses; discoursesen_US
dc.subjectBiblical Studiesen_US
dc.subjectBiblical Studiesen_US
dc.titleDream-Visions in the Aramaic Dead Sea Scrolls: Shared Compositional Patterns and Concernsen_US
dc.typedissertationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentReligious Studiesen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
2.15 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue