Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13322
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Hitchcock, David | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Arthur, Richard | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pineau, Andrew | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-18T17:03:37Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-18T17:03:37Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2013-09-11 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2013-10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | opendissertations/8140 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 9254 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 4577590 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13322 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>In this thesis I deal with the issue of relativism that threatens Toulmin’s field- dependency thesis (i.e. the claim that the standards of argument appraisal depend on the argument field in which the argument occurs). After offering partial interpretation of the concept of “argument fields” and elucidating the concept of field-dependence, I argue that Toulmin’s field-dependency thesis does result in an unacceptably strong relativism.</p> | en_US |
dc.subject | Toulmin | en_US |
dc.subject | relativism | en_US |
dc.subject | argument | en_US |
dc.subject | fields | en_US |
dc.subject | field-dependence | en_US |
dc.subject | Other Philosophy | en_US |
dc.subject | Other Rhetoric and Composition | en_US |
dc.subject | Speech and Rhetorical Studies | en_US |
dc.subject | Other Philosophy | en_US |
dc.title | Toulmin's field-dependency thesis and the threat of relativism | en_US |
dc.type | thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Arts (MA) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
fulltext.pdf | 527.69 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.