Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13039
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPeng, Haoen_US
dc.contributor.advisorJamal Deen, Troy Farncombeen_US
dc.contributor.authorDownie, Evan J.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:01:59Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:01:59Z-
dc.date.created2013-05-14en_US
dc.date.issued2013-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/7872en_US
dc.identifier.other8887en_US
dc.identifier.other4140380en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13039-
dc.description.abstract<p>We investigated the use of multiplexing and an electro-optical coupling system in the design of magnetic resonance compatible positron emission tomography (PET) detectors. Reducing the number of output channels is an effective way to minimize cost and complexity and complements the substitution of coaxial cables for fiber optics. In this work, we first compared the system performance of two multiplexing schemes using both simulation and experimental studies. Simulations were performed using the LTSPICE environment to investigate differences in resulting flood histograms and rising edge slopes. Experiments were performed using Lutetium-Yttrium Oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) crystals of coupled to a SensL ArraySL-4 silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) connected to interchangeable circuit boards containing the two multiplexing schemes of interest. Three crystal configurations were tested: single crystal element (3x3x20 mm<sup>3</sup>), 2x2 array (crystal pitch: 3x3x20 mm<sup>3</sup>) and 6x6 array (crystal pitch: 2.1x2.1x20 mm<sup>3</sup>). Good agreement was found between the simulations and experiment results. The capacitive multiplexer is able to achieve improved time resolution of good uniformity (average of 1.11±0.01ns and 1.90±0.03ns for the arrays, respectively) and crystal separation, compared to the resistive multiplexing (average of 1.95±0.03ns and 3.33±0.10ns). The resistive multiplexing demonstrates slightly improved energy resolution (11±0.1% and 22±0.6%, compared to 12±0.1% and 24±0.4% for the capacitive array). The relevancy of this work to the PET block detector design using SiPM arrays is also discussed, including light sharing, edge compression and gain variation among SiPM pixels. This work also examines the effect of the electro-optical coupling system by comparing the system performance between cases with and without it. The coupling system is found to adversely affect performance, increasing global energy resolution by ~6%, average timing resolution by ~120% and distorting the flood histogram.</p>en_US
dc.subjectNuclear Medical Imagingen_US
dc.subjectScintillation Detectoren_US
dc.subjectMedical Physicsen_US
dc.subjectBiomedical devices and instrumentationen_US
dc.subjectBiomedical devices and instrumentationen_US
dc.titleNOVEL PET BLOCK DETECTOR DESIGN FOR SIMULTANEOUS PET/MR IMAGINGen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBiomedical Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Applied Science (MASc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
2.81 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue