Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/13011
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorYou, Johnen_US
dc.contributor.advisorSherifali, Dianaen_US
dc.contributor.advisorBrazil, Kevinen_US
dc.contributor.authorAbdul-Razzak, Amaneen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:01:54Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:01:54Z-
dc.date.created2013-05-29en_US
dc.date.issued2013-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/7847en_US
dc.identifier.other8908en_US
dc.identifier.other4181100en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/13011-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background:</strong> The objective of this mixed methods study is to understand, from the perspectives of seriously ill hospitalized patients, the effect of modifiable physician behaviours on the perceived quality of end-of-life and ACP communication. <strong></strong></p> <p><strong>Methods:</strong> A convergent parallel mixed methods design is used. Participants were recruited from inpatient medical wards at two academic hospitals, and a population with a high risk of mortality at 6-12 months was selected. In the quantitative strand, a questionnaire was administered to measure patients’ self-rated satisfaction with their physician’s ACP communication skills. The primary analysis involved calculation of the strength of correlation between individual QOC items and a global satisfaction score. In the qualitative strand, interpretive description methods were used to explore seriously ill patients’ perceptions of the quality of ACP communication with their physicians. The mixed methods analysis phase involved the creation of a merged analysis table.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>From the quantitative strand, three priority behaviours pertained to eye contact, providing full attention, and listening. The three major qualitative themes related to nonverbal behaviours; situating a patient in the context of their background, family and social roles; and assisting patients to make the challenging end-of-life transition. The merged analysis allowed for a fuller, contextualized understanding of why the QOC items with the strongest correlation measures were important from a patient perspective.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> This mixed methods study is well-positioned to understand, holistically and from the patient perspective, physician behaviours that influence quality of communication at the end of life.</p>en_US
dc.subjectadvance care planningen_US
dc.subjectend-of-life communicationen_US
dc.subjectmixed methodsen_US
dc.subjectpatient-physician relationsen_US
dc.subjectCritical Careen_US
dc.subjectOncologyen_US
dc.subjectOther Medical Specialtiesen_US
dc.subjectPrimary Careen_US
dc.subjectCritical Careen_US
dc.title“TALK TO ME:” A MIXED METHODS STUDY ON SERIOUSLY ILL PATIENTS’ VIEWS ON PHYSICIAN BEHAVIOURS DURING ADVANCE CARE PLANNING AND END-OF-LIFE COMMUNICATIONen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHealth Research Methodologyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
900.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue