Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/12922
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMahalec, Vladimiren_US
dc.contributor.authorCastillo, Castillo A Pedroen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:01:13Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:01:13Z-
dc.date.created2013-04-22en_US
dc.date.issued2013-04en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/7767en_US
dc.identifier.other8826en_US
dc.identifier.other4051619en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/12922-
dc.description.abstract<p>Current gasoline blend planning practice is to optimize blend plans via discrete-time multi-period NLP or MINLP models and schedule blends via interactive simulation. Solutions of multi-period models using discrete-time representation typically have different blend recipes for each time period. In this work, the concept of an inventory pinch point is introduced and used it to construct a new decomposition of the multi-period MINLP problems: at the top level nonlinear blending problems for periods delimited by the inventory pinch points are solved to optimize multi-grade blend recipes; at the lower level a fine grid multi-period MILP model that uses optimal recipes from the top level is solved in order to determine how much to blend of each product in each fine grid period, subject to minimum threshold blend size. If MILP is infeasible, corresponding period between the pinch points is subdivided and recipes are re-optimized.</p> <p>Two algorithms at the top level are examined: a) multi-period nonlinear model (MPIP) and b) single-period non-linear model (SPIP). Case studies show that the MPIP algorithm produces solutions that have the same optimal value of the objective function as corresponding MINLP model, while the SPIP algorithm computes solutions that are most often within 0.01% of the solutions by MINLP. Both algorithms require substantially less computational effort than the corresponding MINLP model. Reduced number of blend recipes makes it easier for blend scheduler to create a schedule by interactive simulation.</p>en_US
dc.subjectinventory pinchen_US
dc.subjectgasoline blendingen_US
dc.subjectreduced number of blend recipesen_US
dc.subjecttwo-level decompositionen_US
dc.subjectProcess Control and Systemsen_US
dc.subjectProcess Control and Systemsen_US
dc.titleInventory Pinch Algorithms for Gasoline Blend Planningen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentChemical Engineeringen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Applied Science (MASc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
2.86 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue