Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/12866
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorWishart, Laurie R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDePaul, Vincent G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:01:03Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:01:03Z-
dc.date.created2013-02-20en_US
dc.date.issued2013-04en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/7716en_US
dc.identifier.other8776en_US
dc.identifier.other3745185en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/12866-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Background: </strong>Walking dysfunction is one of the most disabling and persistent of stroke-related sequela. Theory- and research-derived motor learning principles (MLPs) offer an ideal theoretical framework for the development and evaluation of walking-skill focused interventions.</p> <p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To: 1) appraise the degree of adherence to motor learning principles (MLPs) in current post-stroke walking-skill training research; 2) describe the Motor Learning Walking Program (MLWP), a novel, MLPs-framed walking training program; and 3) compare the MLWP to an alternate theory-framed walking-focused intervention in community-dwelling individuals within one year of stroke.</p> <p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review methodology was used to identify the prevalent theoretical frameworks in current post-stroke walking training literature, and to appraise the adherence to selected MLPs in walking-focused interventions. A randomized controlled trial (n=71) was conducted to compare the MLWP to a body-weight-supported treadmill training (BWSTT) intervention.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>In the scoping review of 27 walking-focused studies, a minority of investigators explicitly stated a theoretical-framework. Application of MLPs was inconsistent across interventions. In the randomized controlled trial, both intervention groups improved walking function after 5 weeks of training however, there were no significant between-group differences in the primary and secondary outcomes.</p> <p><strong>Conclusions:</strong> To date, there has been limited integration of MLPs into post-stroke walking-skill training literature. This randomized controlled trial is unique in its comparison of two theoretically divergent, yet equally intense, walking-training interventions. While the results were equivocal, future research should continue to explore the impact of application of MLPs on walking-skill recovery after stroke.</p>en_US
dc.subjectstrokeen_US
dc.subjectmotor learningen_US
dc.subjectwalkingen_US
dc.subjectphysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectrehabilitationen_US
dc.subjectrandomized controlled trialen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen_US
dc.subjectPhysiotherapyen_US
dc.titleLearning to walk again: Use of motor learning principles as a theoretical framework for walking-skill training in community-dwelling individuals following strokeen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentRehabilitation Scienceen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
2.73 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue