Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/12713
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorService, Elisabeten_US
dc.contributor.advisorKuperman, Victoren_US
dc.contributor.advisorAnderson, Catherineen_US
dc.contributor.authorHenry, Reginaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T17:00:30Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T17:00:30Z-
dc.date.created2012-10-30en_US
dc.date.issued2012-04en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/7576en_US
dc.identifier.other8635en_US
dc.identifier.other3434530en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/12713-
dc.description.abstract<p>Complex Word Processing in Teenage Poor Readers- Does Morphological Knowledge Help or Hinder?</p> <p>Abstract</p> <p>This longitudinal study addressed development of morphological awareness in fourteen-to-seventeen-year-olds reading disabled (RD) high school students enrolled in the Wilson Reading Program (Wilson, 1989). Our lexical decision experiment and reading fluency assessment took place in the first (session 1) and last months (session 2) of the school year that included training with morphologically complex English words. The lexical decision stimuli were composed of derived (<em>critical</em>), compound (<em>bathtub</em>) and pseudo-complex (<em>postpone</em>) words from the training program (trained words), matched complex words not in the training program (untrained words), and nonwords. Accuracy and response times were compared between sessions, and with a comparison group of age-matched typical readers. The RD group did not demonstrate large post-training gains in reading fluency, but, there were significant improvements in accuracy and speed in visual lexical decision. These improvements did not extend to auditory lexical decision, suggesting that the observed improvements in visual word recognition were a result of the training, and not a practice effect due to multiple testing sessions. Additionally, there was post-training improvement in both trained and untrained words implying that the RD students were able to generalize their acquired knowledge of grapheme-phoneme mappings and morphological processing to novel words. Both the RD and comparison group demonstrated the same hierarchy of accuracy and response time patterns for complex words suggest a processing advantage for visually presented derived and compound words that is not skill dependent.</p>en_US
dc.subjectreading deficitsen_US
dc.subjectadolescentsen_US
dc.subjectmorphologyen_US
dc.subjectremedial reading interventionen_US
dc.subjectcomplex wordsen_US
dc.subjectlexical decisionen_US
dc.subjectReading and Languageen_US
dc.subjectReading and Languageen_US
dc.titleComplex Word Processing in Teenage Poor Readers- Does Morphological Knowledge Help or Hinder?en_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentCognitive Science of Languageen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
1.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue