Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/12583
Title: Magnetic Resonance and Radiography in Rheumatoid Arthritis: Intermodality Comparisons of Erosion Detection
Authors: Tavares, Ruben V.
Advisor: Adachi, Jonathan D.
Colin E. Webber; Karen A. Beattie; Maggie Larche
Department: Medical Sciences (Division of Physiology/Pharmacology)
Keywords: Arthritis;Rheumatoid; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Radiography;Clinical Epidemiology;Other Analytical, Diagnostic and Therapeutic Techniques and Equipment;Rheumatology;Clinical Epidemiology
Publication Date: Oct-2012
Abstract: <p><strong>BACKGROUND</strong>.<strong> </strong>Classically, radiography (x-ray) has been used to visualize the destructive effects of uncontrolled rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on articular bones. Both x-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be used to visualize erosive disease. The multi-slice and multi-planar characteristics of MRI provide greater detail per anatomy imaged than x-ray.</p> <p><strong>OBJECTIVE</strong>. The objective of this dissertation was to compare the relative merits of x-ray and MRI erosion detection.</p> <p><strong>METHODS</strong>. In Chapters 1 through 3, RA, its clinical management, and the role of diagnostic imaging were introduced. In Chapter 4, the overall objective was first investigated by evaluating the current state of knowledge using a systematic review. In Chapter 5, inter-rater reliability across four participating radiologists was investigated. In Chapter 6, reliability-adjusted evaluations were used to directly compare paired x-ray and MR images.</p> <p><strong>RESULTS</strong>. The systematic review indicated that x-ray has low sensitivity and high specificity for MRI erosions. The associations were dependent on RA symptom duration. The findings from the prospective studies conducted were consistent with the literature. In a patient-centred analysis, the proportion of patients with erosive disease detected on either modality was dependent on the anatomy compared. Despite similar proportions of patients with erosive disease detected in comparable diagnostic imaging sittings, the proportions were comprised of markedly different patients.</p> <p><strong>CONCLUSIONS</strong>. The literature comparing x-ray and MRI erosion detection was systematically reviewed. The dependence of the relative diagnostic test accuracy on symptom duration was highlighted. At the patient level of analysis, the greater number of anatomical sites examined on x-ray overcomes the superiority of MRI to detect erosions at the unit of measurement. The two modalities are complementary insofar that they detect erosive disease in distinct patients. Further investigation into the merit of imaging varied anatomy on MR and optimally accounting for inter-rater reliability in such comparisons is warranted.</p>
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/12583
Identifier: opendissertations/7457
8514
3348157
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
4.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue