Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/12417
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Arain, M. Altaf | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Boyce, Joe | en_US |
dc.contributor.advisor | Morris, William A. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Molon, Michelle M. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-18T16:59:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-18T16:59:33Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2012-08-29 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2012-10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | opendissertations/7306 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 8346 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 3273884 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/12417 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>We evaluated 3-D imaging of coarse root structure and biomass using ground-penetrating radar (GPR). GPR surveys were conducted in a white pine forest in southern Ontario, Canada. GPR profiles were obtained across two test plots (6 and 17 m<sup>2</sup> area), using 1-GHz GPR and a MEMS (micro-electro-mechanical systems) accelerometer. Test plot surveys evaluated the effects of micro-topography, soil moisture content, and root diameter and spacing. In addition, with the aid of the outcome of the control test plots two other plots (25 and 400 m<sup>2 </sup>area) were surveyed with varying line sample spacing to investigate the restraints on resolution brought about by line sampling density.</p> <p>Accounting for antenna tilt is necessary to determine an accurate and more precise position of root mass. The antenna tilt was >45<sup>o</sup> pitch, >28<sup>o</sup> roll and up to 10<sup>o</sup> yaw due to surface micro-topography of the forest floor. Vector 3-D imaging enhanced the diffraction amplitude (15.5% increase) and centralized the position of the root. Radial surveys provided root continuity and produced better root imaging.</p> <p>GPR largely underestimates coarse root biomass when a line spacing of 25 cm is used. However similar results are found with smaller line spacing (12.5 cm). A maximum line spacing of 10 cm provided continuous root structure and differentiation of roots spaced 10 cm apart and greater. A sampling line spacing of 5 cm and an inline sampling interval of 0.5 cm in low soil moisture conditions provided the detection of roots that were a minimum of 1.4 cm in diameter.</p> | en_US |
dc.subject | 3-D ground penetrating radar | en_US |
dc.subject | root biomass | en_US |
dc.subject | carbon | en_US |
dc.subject | temperate forest | en_US |
dc.subject | Pinus strobus | en_US |
dc.subject | root structure | en_US |
dc.subject | antenna tilt | en_US |
dc.subject | vector corrections | en_US |
dc.subject | Earth Sciences | en_US |
dc.subject | Geophysics and Seismology | en_US |
dc.subject | Earth Sciences | en_US |
dc.title | Quantitative, non-destructive estimates of forest coarse root biomass using 3-D ground-penetrating radar (GPR) | en_US |
dc.type | thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Geography and Earth Sciences | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Science (MSc) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
fulltext.pdf | 114.16 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.