Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/12417
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorArain, M. Altafen_US
dc.contributor.advisorBoyce, Joeen_US
dc.contributor.advisorMorris, William A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMolon, Michelle M.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:59:33Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:59:33Z-
dc.date.created2012-08-29en_US
dc.date.issued2012-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/7306en_US
dc.identifier.other8346en_US
dc.identifier.other3273884en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/12417-
dc.description.abstract<p>We evaluated 3-D imaging of coarse root structure and biomass using ground-penetrating radar (GPR). GPR surveys were conducted in a white pine forest in southern Ontario, Canada. GPR profiles were obtained across two test plots (6 and 17 m<sup>2</sup> area), using 1-GHz GPR and a MEMS (micro-electro-mechanical systems) accelerometer. Test plot surveys evaluated the effects of micro-topography, soil moisture content, and root diameter and spacing. In addition, with the aid of the outcome of the control test plots two other plots (25 and 400 m<sup>2 </sup>area) were surveyed with varying line sample spacing to investigate the restraints on resolution brought about by line sampling density.</p> <p>Accounting for antenna tilt is necessary to determine an accurate and more precise position of root mass. The antenna tilt was >45<sup>o</sup> pitch, >28<sup>o</sup> roll and up to 10<sup>o</sup> yaw due to surface micro-topography of the forest floor. Vector 3-D imaging enhanced the diffraction amplitude (15.5% increase) and centralized the position of the root. Radial surveys provided root continuity and produced better root imaging.</p> <p>GPR largely underestimates coarse root biomass when a line spacing of 25 cm is used. However similar results are found with smaller line spacing (12.5 cm). A maximum line spacing of 10 cm provided continuous root structure and differentiation of roots spaced 10 cm apart and greater. A sampling line spacing of 5 cm and an inline sampling interval of 0.5 cm in low soil moisture conditions provided the detection of roots that were a minimum of 1.4 cm in diameter.</p>en_US
dc.subject3-D ground penetrating radaren_US
dc.subjectroot biomassen_US
dc.subjectcarbonen_US
dc.subjecttemperate foresten_US
dc.subjectPinus strobusen_US
dc.subjectroot structureen_US
dc.subjectantenna tilten_US
dc.subjectvector correctionsen_US
dc.subjectEarth Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectGeophysics and Seismologyen_US
dc.subjectEarth Sciencesen_US
dc.titleQuantitative, non-destructive estimates of forest coarse root biomass using 3-D ground-penetrating radar (GPR)en_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentGeography and Earth Sciencesen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
114.16 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue