Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/12347
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBecker, Suzannaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHan, Xueen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:59:16Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:59:16Z-
dc.date.created2012-08-09en_US
dc.date.issued2012-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/7242en_US
dc.identifier.other8288en_US
dc.identifier.other3195462en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/12347-
dc.description.abstract<p>We investigated 1) how objects come to serve as landmarks in spatial memory and more specifically how they form part of an allocentric cognitive map and 2) how humans encode multiple connected spatial environments. In both sets of experiments, participants performing a virtual driving task incidentally learned the layout of a town and locations of objects or stores in that town. Their spatial memory and recognition memory for the objects or stores were subsequently tested. To assess whether the objects were encoded allocentrically, we developed a new measurement, pointing consistency. We found that when participants had more limited experience of the environment spatial memory for objects at navigationally relevant locations was more consistent across tested viewpoints than for objects at navigationally less relevant locations. When participants’ attention was focused on the appearance of objects, the navigational relevance effect was eliminated, whereas when their attention was focused on the objects’ locations, this effect was enhanced, supporting the hypothesis that when objects are processed in the service of navigation, rather than merely being viewed as objects, they engage qualitatively distinct attentional systems and are incorporated into an allocentric spatial representation. The results were consistent with evidence from the neuroimaging literature that when objects are relevant to navigation, they not only engage the ventral “object processing stream”, but also the dorsal stream and medial temporal lobe memory system classically associated with allocentric spatial memory. Moreover, in the connected environments, our data were more consistent with the formation of local maps, regardless of whether the neighborhoods were learned together or separately. Only when all visible distinctions between neighborhoods were removed did people behave as if they formed one integrated map. These data are broadly consistent with evidence from rodent hippocampal place cell recordings in connected boxes, and with hierarchical models of spatial coding.</p>en_US
dc.subjectSpatial memoryen_US
dc.subjectLandmarksen_US
dc.subjectAttentionen_US
dc.subjectDorsal versus Ventral visual streamen_US
dc.subjectAllocentric versus Egocentric representationsen_US
dc.subjectLocal versus Global mapsen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.subjectPsychologyen_US
dc.titleSPATIAL MEMORY AND NAVIGATION IN HUMANSen_US
dc.typedissertationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
1.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue