Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/12071
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSekuler, Allison B.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorBennett, Patrick J.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorGoldreich, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.authorKonar, Yaroslaven_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:58:09Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:58:09Z-
dc.date.created2012-05-08en_US
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6988en_US
dc.identifier.other7995en_US
dc.identifier.other2832399en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/12071-
dc.description.abstract<p>Holistic processing has been deemed a crucial part of human face processing. There are three tasks that are indexes of holistic processing and each is used by many researchers for the purposes of demonstrating that either their participants have intact holistic processing or that holistic processing is impaired or missing. The tasks that demonstrate holistic processing are the face inversion, composite face, and the whole-part tasks. In this dissertation, I evaluate the hypothesis that holistic processing is important for face identification. A secondary hypothesis that is evaluated is whether the three indexes of holistic processing are related and whether they are tapping the same underlying process. Chapter 2 tests the first hypothesis in a large group of young adults and shows that the composite face effect (an index of holistic processing) is not related to accuracy on two identification tasks. Chapter 3 tested both hypotheses and showed that none of the holistic indexes are related to one another and they are unrelated to face identification accuracy. In Chapter 4, a large group of older adults are tested on the composite face task and a face identification task, similar to Experiment 2 from Chapter 2. Unlike the results for young adults, older adults show a significant positive correlation between the composite face effect and identification accuracy even though older adults perform worse on the identification task.</p>en_US
dc.subjectHolistic processingen_US
dc.subjectConposite Face Effecten_US
dc.subjectWhole-Part Effecten_US
dc.subjectInversion Effecten_US
dc.subjectpiece-meal processingen_US
dc.subjectCognition and Perceptionen_US
dc.subjectCognition and Perceptionen_US
dc.titleEVALUATION OF HOLISTIC FACE PROCESSINGen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
2.87 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue