Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/12015
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPayton, James R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVan, Vliet P. Jasonen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:57:59Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:57:59Z-
dc.date.created2012-05-08en_US
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6937en_US
dc.identifier.other7994en_US
dc.identifier.other2832119en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/12015-
dc.description.abstract<p>John Calvin, the sixteenth-century reformer, taught that the fall into sin left the human will bound in a miserable slavery to depravity, unless it is liberated by Jesus Christ. Recently, Dewey J. Hoitenga Jr. has argued that Calvin retains so little of the will as it was created that he cannot adequately account for humanity's moral responsibility. However, a careful examination of Calvin's writings reveals that this reformer develops an understanding of the human will which is more nuanced than Hoitenga would lead one to believe. Like his mentor, Augustine, Calvin distinguishes between a will that is free from external coercion and a will that is equally free to choose either good or evil. In his debate with the Roman Catholic theologian, Albert Pighius, Calvin upholds the former while rejecting the latter. Furthermore, in this same debate, Geneva's reformer voices his agreement with the libertqs in externis - the liberty of the will in earthly matters - as it is expressed, for instance, in the Augsburg Confession Calvin also ardently avoids the kind of deterministic fatalism which some radical reformers, particularly the Libertines, adopted. At the same time, none of these distinctions and qualifications detract him from his fundamental conviction that the fallen human will, of itself, cannot even begin to take the first steps towards salvation. Redemption is not a co-operative venture between the will of God and the will of human beings. Rather, it includes a sovereign work of God's grace upon the human will. Hoitenga's critique raises important questions; however, it fails to pay sufficient attention to the historical and polemical context in which Calvin develops his doctrine of the will. when that context is investigated, it becomes clear that Calvin teaches the depravity, not the destruction, of the human will. A depraved will cannot save itself, but it remains morally responsible for the actions it initiates.</p>en_US
dc.titleArbitrium Humanum: Liberum vel Liberandum? An Historical-Theological Study of John Calvin's Doctrine of the Willen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDivinity Collegeen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Theology (Th.M)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
6.4 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue