Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11760
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorFritz, P.S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHenderson, Ianen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:56:41Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:56:41Z-
dc.date.created2012-01-10en_US
dc.date.issued1992-04en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6704en_US
dc.identifier.other7766en_US
dc.identifier.other2439718en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/11760-
dc.description.abstract<p>Modern wars can be financed by two methods, debt and taxes. Throughout the late seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the British sought to fund their wars by a mixture of the two, developing a sophisticated method of contracting and redeeming the national debt. The wars which Britain fought against Revolutionary and Napoleonic France during the period 1793-1815 were of unparalleled expense. To meet these costs, the British borrowed more heavily, and taxed themselves at a greater rate, than ever before in modern history. The most notable example of the increased tax burdens was the property tax, first introduced by the Younger Pitt in 1798, and renewed in 1803, following the collapse of the 1802 Treaty of Amiens.</p> <p>The tax was detested by those required to pay it. While willing to bear heavy levels of wartime taxation to deliver themselves from Bonaparte's tyranny, they objected to the nature of this tax. They felt it to be 'inquisitorial' and 'inequitable.' At the end of the war, they twice opposed its continuation, and were aided in this by the newspaper press. This thesis focuses upon that protest, delineating the arguments against the tax, and showing the protest to have been widespread. While some historians have seen this protest as orchestrated and incited by the Whig party, it is revealed here as a much more spontaneous and undirected phenomenon.</p>en_US
dc.subjectHistoryen_US
dc.subjectHistoryen_US
dc.titleThe Press and the Property Tax in England: 1812-1816en_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentHistoryen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
51.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue