Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11668
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Vorobej, Mark | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cantine, Thomas M. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-18T16:55:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-18T16:55:59Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2011-12-19 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 1996 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | opendissertations/6620 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 7670 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2414736 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11668 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>All rules or laws depend for their enforcement upon some means of detecting infractions. In this paper I argue that, particularly in the liberal state, the most appropriate and effective means of detection is the complaint of the victim, and I discuss the perils associated with legislation that fails to take this simple principle into account. My arguments are illustrated with examples both from my personal experience in designing rules for a live roleplaying game system (which I claim is a microcosm for the liberal state) and from such real-world cases as the War on Drugs, the exploitation of illegal immigrant labour, and the zina laws of Pakistan.</p> | en_US |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.title | THE ROLE OF DETECTION IN RULE ENFORCEMENT | en_US |
dc.type | thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Arts (MA) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
fulltext.pdf | 4.75 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.