Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11611
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorValaitis, Rutaen_US
dc.contributor.advisorStrachan, Patriciaen_US
dc.contributor.advisorEva, Kevinen_US
dc.contributor.authorBinks, Sallyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:55:31Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:55:31Z-
dc.date.created2011-11-30en_US
dc.date.issued2012-04en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6567en_US
dc.identifier.other7585en_US
dc.identifier.other2381186en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/11611-
dc.description.abstract<p>Safe nursing care of patients with cardiovascular disease requires specialized knowledge and skill. However, education for such specialty practice has little empirical basis. Research has suggested that novices perceive primarily surface aspects of a domain while experts perceive primarily its deep principles. Insight into such perceptual differences may help inform future pedagogical strategies. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether or not such differences are found in the domain of cardiovascular nursing.</p> <p>A forced choice triad task was developed to test the study hypothesis. Each triad trial consisted of a target item and two referent items. Referent items were designed to be similar to target items based on surface features (S) such as patient age or sex, deep features (D) such as the goal of therapy, or both surface and deep features (S/SD). Participants were asked to choose the referent item that they believed was more similar to the target item and to provide a rationale for their choice. The instrument was completed by n=17 nurses in two practice cohorts: a novice/less experienced cohort with less than three years of experience in cardiovascular nursing and an experienced/competent cohort of Nurse Practitioners with at least ten years of experience in the specialty.</p> <p>Statistically non-significant differences in scores between study cohorts occurred in the hypothesized direction. However, due to the small final sample size, no definitive conclusions could be made based on this study's findings.</p>en_US
dc.subjectNovice-experten_US
dc.subjectnursingen_US
dc.subjectcardiovascularen_US
dc.subjectforced choice triad tasken_US
dc.subjectOther Nursingen_US
dc.subjectOther Nursingen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Cardiovascular Nurses' Similarity Judgments at Two Points in the Novice-Expert Continuumen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentNursingen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
1.31 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue