Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11351
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBray, Stevenen_US
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Jeffrey D.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:54:22Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:54:22Z-
dc.date.created2011-09-28en_US
dc.date.issued2011-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6324en_US
dc.identifier.other7376en_US
dc.identifier.other2262700en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/11351-
dc.description.abstract<p>Baumeister and colleagues’ (1998) limited strength model of self-regulation was used as a framework to investigate the independent and combined effects of motivation and conservation on self-control strength depletion. Volunteer university students (<em>N</em> = 72; 23 males and 49 females) participated in the study. Participants completed two maximum endurance isometric handgrip trials separated by the Stroop colour word interference task. Participants were randomized to either a conservation or no-conservation condition before completion of the Stroop task. After performing the Stroop task the participants were then further separated into an autonomy support condition or a no autonomy support condition. It was hypothesized that participants (1) who were provided with autonomy support would perform better on the second endurance trial and report higher feelings of autonomous regulation, (2) who were in the conservation condition would perform worse on the Stroop task and better on the second endurance trial, and (3) who were provided with autonomy support and were in the conservation condition would perform the best on the second endurance trial, while those who were not provided autonomy support and did not conserve were predicted to perform the worst of any group on the second endurance trial. Autonomy support was associated with better performance on the second endurance trial but not greater feelings of autonomous regulation. Conservation was associated with poorer performance on the Stroop task, but not superior performance on the second endurance trial. There was no evidence supporting the combined effects of autonomy support and conservation. Findings support conclusions that people conserve self-control strength when anticipating future strength depletion and autonomy support helps people cope with self-control strength depletion and deliver superior performance on a muscular endurance task.</p>en_US
dc.subjectSelf-Regulationen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Controlen_US
dc.subjectMotivationen_US
dc.subjectConservationen_US
dc.subjectEnergyen_US
dc.subjectSelf-Control Strengthen_US
dc.subjectOther Psychologyen_US
dc.subjectOther Psychologyen_US
dc.titleAn Investigation of the Effects of Energy Conservation and Motivation on Self-Regulation Strength Depletionen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKinesiologyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science in Kinesiologyen_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
719.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue