Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11325
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDavies, Scotten_US
dc.contributor.advisorAurini, Janiceen_US
dc.contributor.advisorMcKerrow, Marken_US
dc.contributor.authorMilne, Emilyen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:54:18Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:54:18Z-
dc.date.created2011-09-27en_US
dc.date.issued2011-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6300en_US
dc.identifier.other7348en_US
dc.identifier.other2261583en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/11325-
dc.description.abstract<p>This study explores connections between school discipline policies and educational inequality by examining the implementation of “Progressive Discipline” (PD) in an Ontario school board. By using positive reinforcements, preventions, and early and ongoing interventions, PD has replaced more punitive “zero tolerance” approaches as the official approach to student discipline in provincial public schools. This study poses two broad research questions that are guided by prominent theories of school organization and family-school relations: i) Given prevailing schooling practices, how is PD actually implemented, ii) can PD compensate for student inequalities in exposure to cultural orientations demanded by schools. To address these questions, this study draws on 36 qualitative interviews with key actors in several schools, and has two key findings. First, despite the official shift from zero tolerance to PD, student discipline continues to be managed by schools and individual school-based actors along a continuum, with some becoming more progressive, while others remaining more punitive. Thus, this policy evolution has involved a shift from a tighter to a more “loosely coupled” form of organization. But despite this variation, school-based actors are gradually embracing PD, since more progressive perspectives on student discipline appear to resonate with many educators and administrators. Second, the shift to PD is creating new forms of cultural practices in schools, and these practices are generating considerable variations in the outcomes of discipline processes. Building on these findings, this study concludes that progressive discipline policy has the potential to serve as a mechanism of “cultural mobility” and partially compensate for students’ unequal exposure to the values, behaviours and skill sets that are needed to comply with schools’ standards of behaviour.</p>en_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectInequalityen_US
dc.subjectPolicyen_US
dc.subjectCultural Capital Theoryen_US
dc.subjectOrganizational Theoryen_US
dc.subjectEducational Assessment, Evaluation, and Researchen_US
dc.subjectEducational Assessment, Evaluation, and Researchen_US
dc.titleLOOSELY CULTIVATING DISCIPLINE: FROM ZERO TOLERANCE TO PROGRESSIVE DISCIPLINE IN AN ONTARIO SCHOOL BOARDen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSociologyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
919.21 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue