Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11303
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorAllen, Barryen_US
dc.contributor.advisorSciaraffa, Stefanen_US
dc.contributor.advisorAjzenstat, S.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPadgett, Corey R.W.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:54:13Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:54:13Z-
dc.date.created2011-09-27en_US
dc.date.issued2011-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6281en_US
dc.identifier.other7324en_US
dc.identifier.other2260532en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/11303-
dc.description<p>Unfortunately I have had bit of difficulty with setting up the page numbers appropriately. I have been unable to figure out how to make the preliminary part of document in Roman numerals while at the same time separating this from the main body of the text using Arabic numbers. My apologies, but I sincerely do not know how to resolve this frustrating problem. I can resolve this problem if I send you the preliminary part and main body as separate documents, but just not as one continuous document. Please contact me if this latter method is the way to go.</p>en_US
dc.description.abstract<p>This thesis provides an expository account and critical analysis of Friedrich Nietzsche’s genealogical position on cruelty. Its primary engagement is with Nietzsche’s <em>On The Genealogy of Morals</em>, however, other works by this author are discussed when relevant. The general import of this thesis is threefold. First, it demonstrates Nietzsche’s genealogical account of cruelty, detailing its complex evolutionary progression and its various facets of influence. Second, this work identifies some authors who are critical of Nietzsche position on cruelty. These criticisms are identified and are then largely refuted on various grounds. Third, this thesis argues that an appropriate critical analysis of Nietzsche’s genealogical theorizing will be based on a cross-examination of his positions with current palaeoanthropological findings. The conclusion drawn from this analysis is that there is insufficient empirical evidence to substantiate Nietzsche’s accounts and his methodical approach to genealogical theorizing is, furthermore, untenable.</p>en_US
dc.subjectNietzscheen_US
dc.subjectCrueltyen_US
dc.subjectGenealogyen_US
dc.subjectPalaeoanthropologyen_US
dc.subjectAsceticen_US
dc.subjectPre-historyen_US
dc.subjectContinental Philosophyen_US
dc.subjectEthics and Political Philosophyen_US
dc.subjectHistory of Philosophyen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophyen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophy of Scienceen_US
dc.subjectContinental Philosophyen_US
dc.titleOn Nietzsche's Genealogy of Crueltyen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPhilosophyen_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
616.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue