Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11296
Title: VALIDITY OF PRE-DISCHARGE FUNCTIONAL MEASURES FOR PREDICTING HARM IN OLDER ADULTS
Authors: Douglas, Alison
Advisor: Letts, Lori
Eva, Kevin
Richardson, Julie
Department: Rehabilitation Science
Keywords: outcome assessment;psychometrics;older adult;safety;patient discharge;Occupational Therapy;Occupational Therapy
Publication Date: Oct-2011
Abstract: <p>Older adults admitted to hospital often must make discharge decisions about whether they will be able to safely manage at home. Decision-making for clients and teams is supported by occupational therapy assessment. This thesis presents three manuscripts from a single study that was designed to address a need for evidence of validity of two measures for predicting harm.</p> <p>The design was a prospective observational study in which older adults from an inpatient unit (n=47) were followed for six months for reports of incidents of harm. Baseline data included independent variables (e.g. age, sex, education, living alone, comorbidities, caregiving hours, ADL score) and scores on two measures: the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS) and the Cognitive Performance Test (CPT).</p> <p>The first manuscript contributed needed validation evidence for the CPT. The CPT correlated moderately with cognitive measures, and scores were not affected by age, and years of education. The CPT differentiated impaired persons differently from other measures. Results highlighted that further evidence to test the CPT against a criterion related to outcomes in the community was needed.</p> <p>The second manuscript tested the trustworthiness of the outcome “incidents of harm”. Test-retest reliability was high and validation against daily logs and medical charts supported this method of measurement of incident of harm.</p> <p>The third manuscript determined whether the AMPS and CPT were valid for predicting incidents of harm after discharge. The results showed that, compared with all independent variables, AMPS-Process scores were the most significant predictor of harm outcome. The CPT had a high specificity for identifying persons who did not have harm. Living alone, age and sex contributed to the prediction of harm. The implications of these results are that scores on the measures can inform patients, families and the team about older adults’ risk of incidents of harm after discharge.</p>
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11296
Identifier: opendissertations/6275
7308
2259345
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
17.85 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue