Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11262
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPanagiotou, Spiroen_US
dc.contributor.advisorJohnstone, Marken_US
dc.contributor.advisorHitchcock, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorBruder, Michael A.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:54:06Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:54:06Z-
dc.date.created2011-09-26en_US
dc.date.issued2011-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6242en_US
dc.identifier.other7284en_US
dc.identifier.other2258399en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/11262-
dc.description.abstract<p>In <em>Physics</em> IV, Aristotle poses the question whether time depends on mind for its existence (223a25-27). This thesis begins by arguing that Aristotle’s account of time is, in fact, one in which time is mind-dependent. The remainder of the thesis demonstrates how this interpretation of time informs and explains Aristotle’s accounts of perception, recollection, and habituation. The thesis is divided into four chapters, each dealing in detail with the topics of time, perception, recollection, and habituation. In Chapter One I argue that time is a phenomenon which requires minds in order to be actualized. In the second chapter I argue that time, as mind-dependent, is an incidental object of perception perceived by the common sense, and that this is consistent with Aristotle’s description of perception in <em>De Anima</em>. Chapter Three provides arguments that recollection, as understood in <em>De Memoria</em>, is a capacity which allows for the association between present perceptions and memory-images. In the final chapter, I argue that the process of habituation in the <em>Nicomachean Ethics</em> is best understood with reference to the associative power of recollection. In this way, I hope to demonstrate how Aristotle’s analysis of time in the <em>Physics</em> has significant implications for our understanding of his views on perception, recollection, and habituation.</p>en_US
dc.subjectAristotleen_US
dc.subjectTimeen_US
dc.subjectMemoryen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectPhysicsen_US
dc.subjectHistory of Philosophyen_US
dc.subjectHistory of Philosophyen_US
dc.titleTHE TIME OF OUR LIVES: ARISTOTLE ON TIME, TEMPORAL PERCEPTION, RECOLLECTION, AND HABITUATION.en_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPhilosophyen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
588.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Title_and_preliminary_pages.pdf
Open Access
64.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue