Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11205
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Simpson, J.E. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Woodhouse, Robert Howard | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-18T16:53:56Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-18T16:53:56Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2011-09-25 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 1971-05 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | opendissertations/6191 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 7272 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2256999 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11205 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>The thesis deals with a contemporary debate between R.M. Hare and Philippa Foot, both of Oxford University, over the fact-value distinction. It centres on their dispute over the meaning of moral terms, the content of moral principles and argument, but attempts to place the debate in its historical context, thus drawing out the main reasons for its importance.</p> | en_US |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.title | CONVENTIONAL MORALITY: A CONTEMPORARY ETHICAL DEBATE SEEN IN PERSPECTIVE | en_US |
dc.type | thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Arts (MA) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
fulltext.pdf | 5.62 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.