CONVENTIONAL MORALITY: A CONTEMPORARY ETHICAL DEBATE SEEN IN PERSPECTIVE

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11205

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.advisor	Simpson, J.E.	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Woodhouse, Robert Howard	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2014-06-18T16:53:56Z	-
dc.date.available	2014-06-18T16:53:56Z	-
dc.date.created	2011-09-25	en_US
dc.date.issued	1971-05	en_US
dc.identifier.other	opendissertations/6191	en_US
dc.identifier.other	7272	en_US
dc.identifier.other	2256999	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11205	-
dc.description.abstract	<p>The thesis deals with a contemporary debate between R.M. Hare and Philippa Foot, both of Oxford University, over the fact-value distinction. It centres on their dispute over the meaning of moral terms, the content of moral principles and argument, but attempts to place the debate in its historical context, thus drawing out the main reasons for its importance.</p>	en_US
dc.subject	Philosophy	en_US
dc.subject	Philosophy	en_US
dc.title	CONVENTIONAL MORALITY: A CONTEMPORARY ETHICAL DEBATE SEEN IN PERSPECTIVE	en_US
dc.type	thesis	en_US
dc.contributor.department	Philosophy	en_US
dc.description.degree	Master of Arts (MA)	en_US
Appears in Collections:	Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
fulltext.pdf Open Access	5.62 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open