Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11189
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorRoy Cain, PhDen_US
dc.contributor.advisorAnn Fudge Schormans, PhDen_US
dc.contributor.advisorSaara Greene, PhDen_US
dc.contributor.authorBrade, Cassandra R.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:53:51Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:53:51Z-
dc.date.created2011-09-16en_US
dc.date.issued2011-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6176en_US
dc.identifier.other7190en_US
dc.identifier.other2241538en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/11189-
dc.description.abstract<p>This research examines the opinions and viewpoints of former Crown Wards regarding the Assessment and Action Record (the AAR), which is the main documentation associated with the Looking After Children approach implemented for use with all children in care by the Ministry of Children and Youth for the Province of Ontario. This documentation, which consists of hundreds of questions and a research-based, check-list format, forms a significant component of the contact that Children’s Service Workers with Children’s Aid Societies have with children in care. Crown Wards, because they are in the permanent care of their Society, are subjected to the AAR yearly throughout their time in care. Open-ended interviews were conducted with four former Crown Wards from three separate Children’s Aid agencies in southwestern Ontario. While the findings did not bear out the anticipated overt criticism of the AAR documentation, what was salient was the hope that all of the information they gave over the years was being put to good use (that it might help themselves and other Crown Wards), that these former Crown Wards were not aware that they could decline to answer the AAR questions in whole or in part, and that the AAR document is felt to be too long and repetitive. In addition, issues of automatic compliance by children in care with requests made by CAS personnel became a discomforting theme.</p>en_US
dc.subjectAssessment and Action Recorden_US
dc.subjectCrown Wardsen_US
dc.subjectOntario child welfareen_US
dc.subjectaccountabilityen_US
dc.subjectconsent in researchen_US
dc.subjectSocial Worken_US
dc.subjectSocial Worken_US
dc.titleIn Whose Best Interest? An Exploration of the Purpose and Expectations of the Assessment and Action Record Through the Eyes of Former Crown Wardsen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSocial Worken_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Social Work (MSW)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Assessment_and_Action_Record_2nd_Canadian_Adaptation_Ages_16___17.pdf
Open Access
9.41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
278.24 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue