Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11108
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMartin Ginis, Kathleen A.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBassett, Rebecca L.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:53:35Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:53:35Z-
dc.date.created2011-08-31en_US
dc.date.issued2011-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6102en_US
dc.identifier.other7128en_US
dc.identifier.other2208613en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/11108-
dc.description.abstract<p>The purpose of this dissertation was to examine the use of health risk communications as a strategy to change risk perceptions and motivate leisure time physical activity (LTPA) among people with spinal cord injury (SCI). Guided by protection motivation theory (PMT; Rogers, 1983) and the extended parallel processing model (EPPM; Witte, 1992), two strategies were examined as unique approaches to enhancing the effectiveness of health risk information. First, risk information was tailored to individualized, objective data regarding participants’ health risk. Second, risk information was supplemented with framed leisure time physical activity (LTPA) efficacy messages. Gain-framed messages emphasized the benefits of LTPA, whereas loss-framed messages emphasized the risks of inactivity. The relative effectiveness of gain- versus loss-framed messages was considered within the context of the EPPM (Witte, 1992). A secondary purpose of the dissertation was to explore cognitive processing in relation to framed LTPA messages. The attention and elaboration phases of cognitive processing were examined for gain- and loss-framed LTPA messages following exposure to health risk information. Three experiments were conducted to 1) test the effectiveness of individualized health risk information for changing health risk perceptions and LTPA among people with SCI, 2) test the relative effectiveness of gain- and loss-framed LTPA efficacy messages presented following health risk information for changing LTPA response efficacy and LTPA intentions among people with SCI, and, 3) investigate the relative attention given to gain-framed versus loss-framed LTPA response efficacy messages following presentation of health risk information to university students. The theoretical and pragmatic contributions are discussed.</p>en_US
dc.subjectphysical activityen_US
dc.subjectrisk communicationen_US
dc.subjectmessage framingen_US
dc.subjectprotection motivation theoryen_US
dc.subjectextended parallel processing modelen_US
dc.subjectcognitive processingen_US
dc.subjectSocial and Behavioral Sciencesen_US
dc.subjectSocial and Behavioral Sciencesen_US
dc.titleUnderstanding Health and Physical Activity Message Strategies: Risk Information and Message Framingen_US
dc.typedissertationen_US
dc.contributor.departmentKinesiologyen_US
dc.description.degreeDoctor of Philosophy (PhD)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
2.26 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue