Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11076
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGriffin, Nicholasen_US
dc.contributor.advisorBlackwell, Kennethen_US
dc.contributor.advisorGarrett, Brianen_US
dc.contributor.authorOlson, Dustin Z.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:53:32Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:53:32Z-
dc.date.created2011-08-29en_US
dc.date.issued2011-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6073en_US
dc.identifier.other7100en_US
dc.identifier.other2200702en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/11076-
dc.description.abstract<p>Bertrand Russell is one of the grandmasters of 20<sup>th</sup> Century Analytic Philosophy. It is surprising, then, that his work fell out of fashion later in his career. As a result, very little has been discussed concerning Russell’s work from the period of 1927 – 59. This thesis provides an analysis of Russell’s philosophical work from this era. Our attention here is on Russell’s theory of perception and the underlying metaphysical structure that is developed as a result of his scientific outlook. Russell’s philosophy during this time focused almost exclusively on perception, knowledge, and the epistemic relationship humans have with the world according to science. It is these topics that are engaged with and explicated. We discover that, due to Russell's outright acceptance of that conclusion found in physics, metaphysically he defends a four-dimensional neutral monist event ontology; perceptually he defends a causal theory where one's perceptions must be understood as only being of one's brain; and epistemically he is a fallibilist, wherein justification can be found in a coherent set of beliefs founded on intrinsically credible individual propositions, but knowledge itself is ultimately a vexed and imprecise concept.</p>en_US
dc.subjectRussellen_US
dc.subjectPerceptionen_US
dc.subjectEpistemologyen_US
dc.subjectMetaphysicsen_US
dc.subjectPhysicsen_US
dc.subjectEpistemologyen_US
dc.subjectMetaphysicsen_US
dc.subjectPhilosophy of Scienceen_US
dc.subjectEpistemologyen_US
dc.titleBertrand Russell On Perception and Knowledge (1927 - 59)en_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPhilosophyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
632.37 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue