Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/11005
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorKroeker, Travis P.en_US
dc.contributor.advisorWiddicombe, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.advisorWiddicombe, Peteren_US
dc.contributor.authorBaker, Grahamen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:53:15Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:53:15Z-
dc.date.created2011-08-23en_US
dc.date.issued2011-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/6007en_US
dc.identifier.other7032en_US
dc.identifier.other2187408en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/11005-
dc.description.abstract<p>This thesis argues for the presence of an apocalyptic theological perspective in Søren Kierkegaard’s <em>Practice in Christianity</em> (1848), one that is of a piece with the apocalypticism that a number of contemporary biblical scholars, theologians and philosophers have located in the letters of the Apostle Paul.</p> <p>Though familiar motifs (such as the imminent eschaton or the idea of two ages) may be helpful indicators of an apocalyptic theological perspective in a given work, I take the position that apocalyptic theology is fundamentally a matter of settling the question of ultimate lordship or sovereignty. In a Christian context, therefore, where an author manifests a desire to declare the ultimate sovereignty of God (by way of the intervening act of his incarnation in Christ) over and against any worldly counter-claim to sovereignty, he or she partakes of an apocalyptic theology.</p> <p>I demonstrate that Kierkegaard’s apocalyptic theological perspective is manifested in three ways in <em>Practice in Christianity</em>, namely, with respect to his thinking about temporality, epistemology and politics. The three chapters that make up this thesis take up these themes in turn. In each case, Kierkegaard’s position on these matters is compared with an apocalyptic reading of Paul’s letters. I argue that a concern to declare the ultimate sovereignty of God in these three fundamental areas of human experience is one that Kierkegaard shares with Paul. Insofar as Paul is therefore regarded by his scholarly readers as an apocalypticist, so too, I argue, should Kierkegaard be.</p> <p>Furthermore, just as the identification of Paul’s apocalypticism is alleged to provide a coherent framework for his gospel, so too, I argue, should Kierkegaard’s apocalypticism be understood as the substratum that informs his theo-philosophical project in <em>Practice in Christianity</em>.</p>en_US
dc.subjectChristian theologyen_US
dc.subject19th century philosophyen_US
dc.subjectKierkegaarden_US
dc.subjectapocalypticismen_US
dc.subjectpolitical theologyen_US
dc.subjectReligious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religionen_US
dc.subjectReligious Thought, Theology and Philosophy of Religionen_US
dc.titleKierkegaard's Apocalyptic Theology: Temporality, Epistemology and Politics in Practice in Christianityen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentReligious Studiesen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Arts (MA)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
482.38 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue