Skip navigation
  • Home
  • Browse
    • Communities
      & Collections
    • Browse Items by:
    • Publication Date
    • Author
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Department
  • Sign on to:
    • My MacSphere
    • Receive email
      updates
    • Edit Profile


McMaster University Home Page
  1. MacSphere
  2. Open Access Dissertations and Theses Community
  3. Open Access Dissertations and Theses
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/10976
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBrown, Stevenen_US
dc.contributor.authorRzeszutek, Tom I.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-18T16:53:06Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-18T16:53:06Z-
dc.date.created2011-08-22en_US
dc.date.issued2011-10en_US
dc.identifier.otheropendissertations/5982en_US
dc.identifier.other7008en_US
dc.identifier.other2182397en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11375/10976-
dc.description.abstract<p>Music is greatly underappreciated in the scope of cross-cultural analysis. This is due in part to methodological problems plaguing recent comparative approaches, and modern ethnomusicology’s stance against cross-cultural analysis. Language, on the other hand, has a long history of cross-cultural study and recent advances in quantitative techniques, borrowed mostly from biology, have put language at the forefront of studying population prehistory from a cultural perspective. Chapter 2 of this thesis presents a novel quantitative approach to studying cross-cultural musical diversity based on the AMOVA methodology borrowed from population genetics. This method allows researchers to quantify the amount of variability found between as well as within populations, and gives us a measure of population-level divergence that accounts for intra-population variability. Our major finding is that the vast majority of musical variability (~98%) is found within populations rather than between. This approach solves many of the quantitative issues with the original Cantometrics approach, and is widely applicable to the analysis of many domains of culture. Aside from methodological issues a major open question is whether music has the requisite time-depth to answer questions about recent human pre-history. Chapter 3 focuses on addressing this question generally, and more specifically investigating which musical features trace population history most effectively. Using a corpus of songs from 9 Taiwanese aboriginal tribes and quantitative methods from chapter 2, we show that features related to song structure are correlated with mitochondrial DNA data from the same populations, while features of singing style are not. Both the quantitative methods and provisional support for music’s time depth presented here will hopefully usher in a new era of comparative musicology and provide scholars of pre-history with an additional tool to answer unresolved questions.</p>en_US
dc.subjectAMOVAen_US
dc.subjectmusical diversityen_US
dc.subjectmigrationen_US
dc.subjectAustronesianen_US
dc.subjectpopulation structureen_US
dc.subjectgeneticsen_US
dc.subjectBiological and Physical Anthropologyen_US
dc.subjectBiological and Physical Anthropologyen_US
dc.titleCross-Cultural Musical Diversity and Implications for its Use in Studying Human Migrationen_US
dc.typethesisen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPsychologyen_US
dc.description.degreeMaster of Science (MSc)en_US
Appears in Collections:Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
fulltext.pdf
Open Access
788.79 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record Statistics


Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Sherman Centre for Digital Scholarship     McMaster University Libraries
©2022 McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4L8 | 905-525-9140 | Contact Us | Terms of Use & Privacy Policy | Feedback

Report Accessibility Issue