"God" and Nonsense

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11375/10725

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.advisor	Thomas, John	en_US
dc.contributor.author	Hayes, Edward Calvin John	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2014-06-18T16:52:23Z	-
dc.date.available	2014-06-18T16:52:23Z	-
dc.date.created	2011-08-08	en_US
dc.date.issued	1971-09	en_US
dc.identifier.other	opendissertations/5752	en_US
dc.identifier.other	6774	en_US
dc.identifier.other	2138109	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11375/10725	-
dc.description.abstract	<p>The following intellectual exercise has as its purpose an evaluation of Antony Flew's neo-positivist falsifiability challenge to the meaningfulness of religious language and Ian Ramsey's attempt to meet that challenge via the use of models and qualifiers. The work: of other philosophers such as Frederick Ferré, William Austin, John Hick and Ronald Hepburn is also related to the points discussed by Flew and Ramsey</p>	en_US
dc.subject	Philosophy	en_US
dc.subject	Philosophy	en_US
dc.title	"God" and Nonsense	en_US
dc.type	thesis	en_US
dc.contributor.department	Philosophy	en_US
dc.description.degree	Master of Arts (MA)	en_US
Appears in Collections:	Open Access Dissertations and Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
fulltext.pdf Open Access	5.5 MB	Adobe PDF	View/Open