Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/10706
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Allen, Barry | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Doxtdator, Benjamin | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-18T16:52:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-18T16:52:19Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2011-08-05 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 2006-08 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | opendissertations/5735 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 6759 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2134593 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/10706 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>In my thesis I argue against the four primary commitments of Evolutionary Psychology 1) Adaptationism, 2) Nativism, 3) Modularity, and 4) Computationalism.</p> <p>In the second half of my thesis, I present an alternative view. I argue that many aspects of human cognition that Evolutionary Psychology take to be adaptations, are in fact spandrels, or by products of adaptation. Facts about human developmental neurobiology put further strain on the first three theses. I reconceptualize human cognition as a decoupled use of artifacts. I claim that this makes better sense of the phylogenie difference between humans and chimpanzees.</p> | en_US |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.title | Making Cognition: Towards an Evolutionary Philosophy of Human Cognition | en_US |
dc.type | thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Arts (MA) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
fulltext.pdf | 4.39 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.