Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11375/10668
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Noxon, James | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Ramberan, George Osmond | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-06-18T16:52:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-06-18T16:52:12Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2011-08-03 | en_US |
dc.date.issued | 1970-10 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | opendissertations/5699 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 6723 | en_US |
dc.identifier.other | 2130756 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11375/10668 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>The purpose of this thesis is to show that Hume's criticisms of the Design Argument weakened considerably the logical foundation of this argument. Not only was Hume concerned to expose the local weakness of the argument, but also to show the futility involved in formulating rational "demonstrations" for the existence, nature and attributes of God. It is my contention that Hume's damaging criticisms of the design argument helped to point out the necessity of "Faith and Revelation" to the theological discipline. Many modern-day theologians have come to see this, and as such are concentrating their attention upon existentialism, faith and divine revelation, rather than upon rational theistic demonstrations.</p> | en_US |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.subject | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.title | A Critique of Hume's Analysis of the Design Argument | en_US |
dc.type | thesis | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Philosophy | en_US |
dc.description.degree | Master of Arts (MA) | en_US |
Appears in Collections: | Open Access Dissertations and Theses |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
fulltext.pdf | 4.57 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in MacSphere are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.